Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 Ohio App. 3d 706 - State v. Davis

81 Ohio App. 3d 706 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Jenks · State v. Xie · State v. Mills · State v. DeMarco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person is under `detention' as that term is used in R.C. 2921.34 , when he is arrested and the arresting officer has established control over his person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. State v. Newman, Unpublished Decision (4-29-2004) · State v. Askew, Unpublished Decision (9-11-2006)
  2. “(1) The escape involved no substantial risk of harm to the person or property of another. {¶ 30}”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. State v. Davis, 2007-Ca-00104 (5-16-2008) · State v. Carson, 90975 (4-30-2009)
  3. “the `control' necessary to establish detention need not be established by physical restraint.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. State v. Newman, Unpublished Decision (4-29-2004) · State v. Askew, Unpublished Decision (9-11-2006)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.