Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 Ohio App. 3d 834 - State v. Frambach

81 Ohio App. 3d 834 - State v. Frambach’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2025

16 state decisions

801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (Charitable Assistance and Food Bank Act of 1987)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · Solem v. Helm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Reviewing courts * * * should grant substantial deference to the broad authority that legislatures necessarily possess in determining the types and limits of punishments for crimes * * *.’” State v. Frambach (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 834, 842 , 612 N.E.2d 424, 429 , quoting Solem, supra, 463 U.S. at 290 , 103 S.Ct. at 3009 , 77 L.Ed.2d at 649 . To warrant constitutional intercession, “[t]he penalty must be so greatly disproportionate to the offense as to shock the sense of justice in the community.” State v. Chaffin (1972), 30 Ohio St.2d 13 , 59 O.O.2d 51 , 282 N.E.2d 46 , paragraph three of the syllabus. See, also, State v. Young (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 249 , 525 N.E.2d 1363 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Raymond I "). The plain language of the statute allows, but does not require , the use of a "certified copy of the entry of judgment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “R.C. 2945.75 [B] sanctions merely one means of proving a prior conviction but not the only one”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.