Crabbe v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2000
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kohl v. Lindley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. A false representation; actual or implied, or the concealment of a matter of fact, material to the transaction, made falsely. 2. Knowledge of the falsity — or statements made with such utter disregard and recklessness that knowledge is inferred. 3. Intent to mislead another into relying on the misrepresentation. 4. Reliance — with a right to rely. 5. Injury as a consequence of that reliance. All of these elements must be present if actionable fraud is to be found.” Crabbe v. Freeman, Ohio Mun., 160 N.E.2d 583, 585 , 81 O.Law Abst. 65, 67 (1959).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.