Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 OHIOST3D 22 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

199
cited by 199 later decisions
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 188 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 199 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Issa (2001), State v. Yarbrough (2002)

6 federal appellate · 188 state decisions

11201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · State v. Jenks · Edwards v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 199 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is to examine the evidence admitted at trial to determine whether such evidence, if believed, would convince the average mind of the [appellant's] guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The use of voter registration rolls as exclusive sources for jury selection is constitutional and does not systematically, [or] intentionally, exclude any [economic, social, religious, racial, political and geographical group of the community].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “prejudicially [affect] substantial rights of the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.