Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 OHIOST3D 673 - State v. Sallie

State v. Sallie’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

709
cited by 709 later decisions
5
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

706 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 709 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-Appellee (2000), 190 Ohio App. 3d 35 - State v. Monford (2010)

706 state decisions

29201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Carter · Bostic v. Connor · State v. Thompson · State v. Keith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 709 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Trial counsel is entitled to a strong presumption that all decisions fall within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “judicial scrutiny of counsel's performance is to be highly deferential, and reviewing courts must refrain from second-guessing the strategic decisions of trial counsel”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Appellant maintains that expert testimony on battered woman syndrome can be crucial when the mental state of the battered woman is at issue in a trial. [The State] argues that expert testimony about battered women syndrome was inconsistent with the defense of accident or suicide. In the present case appellant’s testimony was that the shooting was accidental or that the decedent was trying to shoot himself.... Thus, testimony of an expert in battered women syndrome would be inconsistent to the facts presented here. The court did not commit plain error in failing to appoint an expert. Appellant’s fifth assignment of error is without merit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.