Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 Okla. Crim. 412 - Smith v. State

81 Okla. Crim. 412 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1994

6 state decisions

30194619501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 70 Okla. Crim. 304 - Ex Parte Meadows · 75 Okla. Crim. 275 - Dunbar v. State · 13 Okla. Crim. 472 - Ex Parte Hightower · 16 Okla. Crim. 579 - Coleman v. State · Driggers v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A verdict finding the defendant guilty as charged in the information, and fixing his punishment ‘at —-or by the court,’ is insufficient as to form, and is too vague and uncertain to support a judgment and sentence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.