Treadgold v. Willard’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1979
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Catlin v. Jones · State v. Downing · Bertram v. Cook · Merrill v. Missouri Bridge Co. · Hornefius v. Wilkinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To the effect that omitted averments may be supplied by the allegations of an adverse party, see, also, Turner v. Corbett, 9 Or. 79 ; Ferrera v. Parke, 19 Or. 141 ( 23 Pac. 883 ); State ex rel. v. Downing, 40 Or. 309 ( 58 Pac. 863 , 66 Pac. 917 ); Catlin v. Jones, 48 Or. 158 ( 85 Pac. 515 ); Hornefius v. Wilkinson, 51 Or. 45 ( 93 Pac. 474 ).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““If a necessary allegation is omitted from a pleading, and the missing allegation is either alleged or admitted by the pleading of the adverse party, the defect is cured.” 31 Cyc., p. 714.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.