French v. McKean’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1941
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conrad v. Pacific Packing Co. · Lillienthal v. Caravita · Lane v. Wentworth · Alliance Trust Co. v. O'Brien
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The party desiring to appeal may cause a notice signed by himself or attorney, to be served on such adverse party or parties as have appeared in the action or suit, or upon his or their attorney * # .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a party whose interest in relation to the judgment or decree is in conflict with the modification or reversal sought by the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.