81 So. 3d 101 - Does v. Foti’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 450 So. 2d 933 - Title Research Corp. v. Rausch · 779 So. 2d 691 - Landis v. Moreau · State v. Roy · 553 So. 2d 806 - Cormier v. PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST OF GIULIO · Demma v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Nothing in this Chapter shall be construed to require disclosures of records, or the information contained therein, held by the offices of the attorney general, district attorneys, sheriffs, police departments, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, marshals, inves tigators, public health investigators, correctional agencies, communications districts, intelligence agencies, or publicly owned water districts of the state, which records are: (1) Records pertaining to pending criminal litigation or any criminal | litigation which can be reasonably anticipated, until such litigation has been finally adjudicated or otherwise settled, except as otherwise provided in Subsection F of this Section [which is not applicable in the instant ease]; ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he failure or refusal of a grand jury to indict a defendant does not preclude a subsequent indictment by the same or another grand jury, or the subsequent filing of an information or affidavit against [her], for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.