Hodson v. Keiser’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 65th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on In Re King's Estate · Garza v. Alviar · Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Brown v. United States · Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the child support context, an appellant may challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support a finding of net resources, a finding of the proven needs of the child, a finding of voluntary unemployment or underemployment, or a finding of a material and substantial change in circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Ev
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.