Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 TC 893 - Vaughn v. Commissioner

Vaughn v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
November 2009
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2009

30198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co · Corn Products Refining Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · United States v. Cumberland Public Service Co. · Griffiths v. Helvering · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Carl L. Danielson and Pauline S. Danielson, Commissioner Ofinternal Revenue v. Helen P. Sherman, Commissioner Ofinternal Revenue v. Estate of Jacob F. Schaffner, Deceased, Elizabeth Schaffner and Erwin Marsch, Executors, and Elizabeth Schaffner, Commissionerof Internal Revenue v. Hugh E. McLennan and Katherine McLennan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We conclude that the form of the three transfers to Steven reflect the substance of the transactions, and that these transfers constituted bona fide sales to Steven. We also conclude that Steven (and not Charles as respondent contends) received the liquidating distribution from Perry. However, we must still consider what effect the escrow agreement has on these transactions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This is because of the greater potential for complicity between related parties in arranging their affairs in a manner devoid of legitimate motivations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.