<p>Sunday Law — Companion Case.</p> <p>Where appellant was convicted of a violation of the Sunday law, for exhibiting in a place for amusement a moving picture show on Sunday, and the question raised as to the invalidity of the law was adversely t decided against appellant in a companion case, t'he judgment must be affirmed. Davidson, Presiding Judge, dissenting.</p> <p>[Final dissenting opinion October 22, 1917. — Reporter.]</p>
Decided 1917-02-28
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
¶1
This conviction was for violation of article 303, P. C., wherein appellant was convicted for exhibiting in
*660
a place of amusement a moving picture show on Sunday. The majority of the court have held the law constitutional and valid in the Zucarro case, this day decided. I can npt concur in will write later for my non-concurrence and file in the Zucarro case. Under the authority of that case this judgment will be affirmed.
[Final dissenting opinion October 22, 1917. — Reporter.]