Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 U.S. 15 - Steings v. Franklin County

Steings v. Franklin County’s Empirical Analysis

81 U.S. 15 · 1871

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2010 · most notably Adkins v. Children's Hospital of the District of Columbia Same (1923), Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. (1937)

16 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

80187118801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Knight's Administrator · United States v. Ballard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rely on the fact that said statute and ordinance were in violation of, and repugnant to, the Constitution of the United States, for their defence and plea in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Matters resting in the discretion of a sub ordinate court cannot be assigned for error in an appellate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.