Frayser's Adm'r v. R. & A. R. R.’s Empirical Analysis
1886
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1996
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gilman v. Illinois and Mississippi Telegraph Company. Coykendall, Garnishee v. Idem · American Bridge Company v. Heidelbach · Noyes v. Rich · Puryear v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“entitled to receive and apply to his own use, the income and profits of the mortgaged estate. And this is true although the mortgage by its terms covers the rents and profits....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.