Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 WASH 147 - Nason & Co. v. Stack

Nason & Co. v. Stack’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1919
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ephraim v. Kelleher · Benham v. Ham · Warren v. His Creditors · Adams v. Dempsey · Van Winkle v. Mitchum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That reduction was the limit and, so far as we can observe, there is nothing to gainsay respondent’s position that it was considered that a $12,000 valuation would represent all the stock required in the business, and that the payment of one-half of this reduction to the mortgagee would leave ample funds in the hands of the mortgagor to carry on his business and meet his current bills.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.