Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 WVA 478 - Love v. McCoy

Love v. McCoy’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
October 1947
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daniels v. Tearney · Turpin v. Lemon · Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright · Hoxie v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad · 79 W. Va. 796 - Sutherland v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not the policy of the law to permit escape from the legal consequences of the execution of such an instrument, if some one or more of the persons who bind themselves to perform its conditions receive and enjoy its fruits or the protection it affords, or derive some material or financial benefit from it. They will, not, in either such event, when summoned to account for a breach of the conditions, be permitted to plead the voidness of the statute necessitating the execution of the undertaking.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.