Jones v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
810 F.2d 1001 · 1986
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Hale v. Bowen (1987), Walker v. Bowen (1987)
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on MaCgregor v. Bowen · Boyd v. Heckler · Bowen v. Heckler · Broughton v. Heckler · Tieniber v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n determining whether the claimant has satisfied this burden, the examiner must consider four factors: (1) objective medical facts or clinical findings; (2) the diagnoses of examining physicians; (3) evidence of pain; and (4) the claimant's age, education, and work history.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johns v. Bowen · Walker v. Bowen“it is the duty of the ... [ALJ] to make specific and well-articulated findings as to the effect of the combination of impairments and to decide whether the combined impairments cause the claimant to be disabled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Walker v. Bowen“a claimant has alleged a multitude of impairments, a claim for social security benefits may lie even though none of the impairments, considered individually, is disabling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Walker v. Bowen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.