Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 810 F.2d 1030 - Lee v. Hutson

Lee v. Hutson’s Empirical Analysis

810 F.2d 1030 · 1987

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
June 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Gates (1994), Swank v. Smart (1990)

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Parratt v. Taylor · Paul v. Davis · Bishop v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here a state’s procedures governing the taking of property are not fundamentally unfair on their face, and where an adequate remedy exists under state law to correct alleged errors in the administration of those procedures, there can be no deprivation without procedural due process because all process ‘due’ has been afforded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[although procedural due process might be violated if a mechanism for correcting these alleged errors were not available, Georgia does provide avenues for redress of such claims_”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[N]ot every wrong committed by a state actor rises to the level of a 'constitutional tort' sufficient to trigger a substantive due process violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.