Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 810 F.2d 1133 - Schultz v. United States Navy

Schultz v. United States Navy’s Empirical Analysis

810 F.2d 1133 · 1987

Citation profile

143
cited by 143 later decisions
2
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 143 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board (1992), 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the Navy (1991)

40 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

56019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. Medberry · 111 F. Supp. 945 - Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United States · Christie v. United States · Covington v. Department of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 143 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the reason for the threatened removal could not be substantiated,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the board not only has jurisdiction, but also the employee wins on the merits and is entitled to reinstatement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “However, an ostensibly voluntary resignation which was submitted as a result of agency coercion or because of improper advice on its consequences must be treated the same as an adverse action. Perlman v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 397 , 490 F.2d 928 , 933 (1974).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.