Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 810 F.2d 662 - Cronson v. Clark

Cronson v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

810 F.2d 662 · 1987

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen Corp. (1987), Crowley Cutlery Company v. United States of America and Commissioner of Customs of the United States Customs Service (1988)

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

12019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Paul v. Davis · Allen v. Wright · Hagans v. Lavine · American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois v. City of St. Charles · Schultz v. Baumgart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is certain that the due process clause does not confer on [the state auditor] a right to conduct a more extensive audit of the Supreme Court of Illinois, and therefore that he has suffered no injury on which this suit might proceed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Indignation that the law is not being obeyed ... will [not] support a federal lawsuit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.