Dogpatch Usa Inc Dogpatch Properties Inc v. Dogpatch Usa Inc’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Matter of Wood v. P Wood & Pa, Dow Corning Corporation Lindsey v. O'Brien Tanski Tanzer and Young Health Care Providers of Connecticut (1996)
1 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · National City Bank v. Coopers & Lybrand · Zweygardt v. Colorado Nat. Bank of Denver · Equimark Commercial Finance Co. v. Novachich (In Re Showcase Natural Casing Co.)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he test for determining whether a civil proceeding is related to bankruptcy is whether the outcome of that proceeding could conceivably have any effect on the estate being administered in bankruptcy * * *. An action is related to bankruptcy if the outcome could alter the debtor’s rights, liabilities, options, or freedom of action * * * and which in any way impacts upon the handling and administration of the bankrupt estate.””
22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[f]or a proceeding to be 'related to' a bankruptcy case for purposes of bankruptcy jurisdiction, courts require that it 'have some effect on the administration of the debtor's estate.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.