United States v. Roenigk’s Empirical Analysis
810 F.2d 809 · 1987
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably United States v. York (1991), United States v. Cerone (1987)
63 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1623
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Holland v. United States · Luce v. United States · Angrist v. United States · Collins v. Wayne Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“excessive exploration by the government of the circumstances and details of prior criminal conduct may be so prejudicial as to amount to plain error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[A] party whose motion in limine has been overruled must object when the error the party sought to prevent is about to occur at trial.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A cautionary instruction, explaining to the jury that the defendant was not on trial for any conduct not alleged in the indictment, might ... diminish[ ] the prejudicial impact”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.