United States v. Hepperle’s Empirical Analysis
810 F.2d 836 · 1987
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2018 · most notably Michael McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center, Inc (1989), United States v. Panitz (1990)
20 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314
Relies on Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · United States v. Ross · South Dakota v. Opperman · United States v. Chadwick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he officer taking property under the warrant shall give to the person from whom or from whose premises the property was taken a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken or shall leave the copy and receipt at the place from which the property was taken . . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Nothing in the fourth amendment or Rule 41 requires that the search warrant be physically present prior to commencing the search.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a greater potential for confrontation and violence,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.