Walker v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
810 F.3d 568 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3 · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Hill v. Lockhart · Teague v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ha[s] rejected every claim that a new rule satisfied the requirements for watershed status.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Barnes“Whorton , 549 U.S. at 418 , 127 S.Ct. 1173 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Barnes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.