United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
810 F.3d 932 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1958 · 18 U.S.C. § 373 · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Olano · Johnson v. United States · Davis v. Washington · Stirone v. United States · United States v. Randall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] court cannot permit a defendant to be tried on charges that are not made in the indictment against him.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“So, I've said 'or.' " Id . The jury returned a guilty verdict the next day. The district court sentenced Camara to a 36-month term of imprisonment, and he timely appealed. II. A. 1. Camara's challenges to his conviction center on the district court's supplemental instruction. 1 His first and primary argument is that the district court's response to the jury's question constructively amended his indictment in violation of the Fifth Amendment. We disagree. The Fifth Amendment provides that "[n]o person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'the exclusive province of the grand jury' to alter or broaden the charges set out in an indictment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.