Thronson v. Thronson’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2023
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re J. P. · Hutchison v. Hutchison · Hogge v. Hogge · English v. English · 5 Kan. App. 2d 284 - Larsen v. Larsen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. the financial condition and needs of the party seeking alimony; 2. that party's ability to produce sufficient income for him or herself; and 3. the ability of the other party to provide support.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hill v. Hill“a rebuttable presumption that joint legal custody ... is in the best interest of the child,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dahl v. Dahl“retroactive application is not appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.