Calloway v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 858 (§ 417 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Heath v. Alabama · United States v. Shabani · United States v. Lanza · Drinkard v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While mere presence at the scene of a crime is not sufficient evidence to convict one of being a party to a crime, criminal intent may be inferred from presence, companionship, and conduct before, during and after the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McGruder v. State“this is a ground on which only a trial court may exercise its discretion to grant a new trial; we do not have the same authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ayers-Jones v. State“a drug with knowledge of the chemical identity of that drug.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Awtrey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.