Drews v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Malcolm v. State · Wright v. State · Pruitt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded evidence at trial). We begin by evaluating whether seatbelt-use evidence is relevant to causation under circumstances like these, and in so doing we turn to the text of Georgia's hit-and-run statute. That statute makes clear that for an accident to qualify as a felony hit-and-run offense under OCGA § 40-6-270 (b), the accident in which the defendant was involved must be”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mondor“Evidence which is not relevant shall not be admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mondor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.