Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 810 SE2D 554 - Norwood v. State

Norwood v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Jackson v. Denno · Oregon v. Elstad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'that the existence of a pre-warning statement does not require suppression of a post-warning statement that was knowingly and voluntarily made, [id.] at 309, 105 S.Ct. 1285 , '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'because Seibert is a plurality decision and Justice Kennedy concurred in the result on the narrowest grounds, it is his concurring opinion that provides the controlling law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.