Flanders v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 524
Relies on Deal v. Coleman · Texas v. United States · Owaski v. Jet Florida Systems, Inc. · Southern General Insurance v. Holt · Walker v. Wilde
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A judge is charged with interpreting the law in accordance with the original and/or plain meaning of the text at issue (and all that the text fairly implies)....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Words that can have more than one meaning are given content, however, by their surroundings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A statute draws it meaning, of course, from its text.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.