¶1We affirm Appellant’s claim that Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), entitles him to relief. This point is insufficiently pled. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Appellant might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion indicating where and how the record demonstrates that he is entitled to relief. See Holsworth v. State, 522 So.2d 348 (Fla.1988).
810 So. 2d 1008
Gibson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 27, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-02-27
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2015
7 state decisions
Relies on 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · 522 So. 2d 348 - Holsworth v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-02-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →