810 So. 2d 1019 - McBride v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 750 So. 2d 643 - State v. Thompson · 801 So. 2d 101 - Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano · 786 So. 2d 1173 - Carter v. State · 610 So. 2d 435 - Lamont v. State · U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IS A DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO RELIEF PURSUANT TO A SUCCESSIVE RULE 3.800(a) MOTION TO CORRECT AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE WHEN THE DEFENDANT RAISED THE IDENTICAL ISSUE IN A PRIOR RULE 3.800(a) MOTION THAT WAS DENIED BY THE TRIAL COURT BUT NEVER APPEALED TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.