Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 810 SO2D 1023 - Diaz v. State

Diaz v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 781 So. 2d 1040 - Cherry v. State · 552 So. 2d 1082 - Stevens v. State · 611 So. 2d 1250 - Simmons v. State · Watrous v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to anticipate changes in the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.