810 So. 2d 1245 - Guy v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 292 So. 2d 216 - LeBrane v. Lewis · 673 So. 2d 994 - Baumeister v. Plunkett · Miller v. Keating · 617 So. 2d 477 - Benoit v. Capitol Mfg. Co. · 588 So. 2d 1353 - Barto v. Franchise Enterprises, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so closely connected in time, place, and causation to his employment duties as to be regarded as a risk of harm fairly attributable to the employer's business, as compared with conduct instituted by purely personal considerations entirely extraneous to the employer's interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) whether the tortious act was primarily employment rooted; (2) whether the violence was reasonably incidental to the performance of the employee's duties; (3) whether the act occurred on the employer's premises; and (4) whether it occurred during the hours of employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.