Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 810 SO2D 1250 - State v. Hight

State v. Hight’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Boykin v. Alabama · Jones v. Howard · Bottoson v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is, of course, the better practice to advise the defendant, in detail, of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. The question here is whether, in the absence of that specific advice, the record provides a basis for concluding the defendant was aware of this danger and disadvantage. [[Image here]] | sIt is apparent from these facts that prior to these offenses the defendant had extensive experience with the judicial process and criminal justice system. Consequently, under the circumstances existing in these particular cases there is a sound basis for concluding defendant was, at the time of waiving legal counsel, aware of the danger and disadvantage of self-representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.