Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 810 So. 2d 532 - Bryant v. State

810 So. 2d 532 - Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · Pope v. Nebraska · Nooner v. State · Fountain v. United States · 229 So. 2d 855 - Paramore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A videotape, like a still photograph may be admissible, “if relevant to any issue required to be proven in a case,” State v. Wright, 265 So.2d 361, 362 (Fla.1972), “unless it is barred by a rule of exclusion or its admission fails a balancing test to determine whether the probative value is outweighed by its prejudicial effect.” Rose v. State, 787 So.2d 786, 794 (Fla. 2001).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.