Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

810 So. 2d 986

Washington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 13, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-02-13

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2002

Relies on 790 So. 2d 550 - Major v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):

¶2WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
/810/so2d/986 · .json · Public domain