Castillo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2016
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · United States v. Giordano · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · United States v. Spagnuolo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c), a judge appointed under Subsection (a) may act on an application for" authorization to intercept wire, oral, or electronic communications if the judge is appointed as the judge of competent jurisdiction within the administrative judicial district in which the following is located; (1) the site of; (A) the proposed interception; or (B) the interception device to be installed ' or monitored; (2) the cómmunication device to be intercepted; (3) the billing, residential, or business address of the subscriber to the electronic communications service to be intercepted; (4) the headquarters of the law enforcement agency that makes a request for or executes an order authorizing an interception; or (5) the headquarters of the service provider.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the aural or other acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.