Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 810 SW2D 204 - Boulden v. State

Boulden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Butler v. State · Baugh v. State · Williams v. State · Boulden v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court of Appeals also found reversible error on a point [improper jury argument] which the State did not seek review. Therefore, that part of the Court of Appeals’ opin ion requiring the entry of an acquittal is reformed and the judgment of the Court of Appeals, as reformed, is affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.