Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 810 S.W.2d 593 - Herrin v. Straus

Herrin v. Straus’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc. · White v. Smith · Hamm v. Hamm · 98 N.J. Super. 252 - Jacobs v. PENDEL · 71 N.C. App. 215 - Williams and Michael, PA v. Kennamer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Immediately upon the entry of an order or judgment, the clerk shall serve notice of the entry by mail in the manner provided for in Rule 43.01 upon each party who is not in default for failure to appear and who was not present in court in person or by attorney at the time of the entry of such order or judgment. If such notice is not given, the order or judgment shall be set aside for good cause shown upon written motion filed within six months from the entry of the order or judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.