Rucker v. Rucker’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cain v. Cain · Hammerman & Gainer, Inc. v. Bullock · Bonar v. Bonar · Jones v. Latham · Texas Commerce Bank-Irving v. McCreary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In addition to the exemption prescribed by Section 4.2.001, a person’s right to the assets held in or to receive payments, whether vested or not, under any stock bonus, pension, profit-sharing, or similar plan, including a retirement plan for self-employed individuals, and under any annuity or similar contract purchased with assets distributed from that type of plan, and under any retirement annuity or account described by Section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and under any individual retirement account or any individual retirement annuity ... is exempt from attachment, execution, and seizure for the satisfaction of debts unless the plan, con tract or account does not qualify under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of1986. 3”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lozano v. Lozano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.