Centex Corp. v. Dalton’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 166th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1467A · 12 U.S.C. § 1818
Relies on Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum Company · Lewis v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Centex”) and its directors, officers, employees, agents, service corporations, and other persons acting on behalf of Centex Corporation shall not cause Centex Corporation, or Texas Trust Savings Bank. F.S.B., Llano, Texas, or any other of its affiliates, affiliated persons, subsidiaries, or service corporations (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.