Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 811 F.2d 1232 - United States v. Valles-Valencia

United States v. Valles-Valencia’s Empirical Analysis

811 F.2d 1232 · 1987

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
6
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Petzoldt v. Commissioner (1989), United States v. Castillo (1988)

59 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

5601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · Gerstein v. Pugh · Rideout v. United States · Segura v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the acceptance of one party's defense will preclude the acquittal of the other party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the acquittal of all but one of the conspirators signifies that the jury found no agreement to act, and the remaining conspirator cannot have [conspired with himself] since '[c]onspiracy requires a plurality of actors....'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a joint trial was so manifestly prejudicial as to require the trial judge to exercise his discretion in but one way, by ordering a separate trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.