Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 811 F.2d 1293 - Davis v. Xerox

Davis v. Xerox’s Empirical Analysis

811 F.2d 1293 · 1987

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
June 2022
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2022

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

7019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Tumey v. State of Ohio · Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. · Arizona v. United States District Court · Health Services Acquisition Corp. v. Liljeberg · Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) [A sitting judge] shall also disqualify himself [or herself] in the following circumstances: (4) He knows that he ... or his spouse or a minor child residing in his household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy ... or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]f a reasonable person would conclude from all the circumstances that the judge did not have knowledge at the time he sat, his rulings stand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.