Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

811 F.2d 269

Docket Nos. 86-1226, 86-1381.

United States v. Jackson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 10, 1987.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-02-10

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1987

3 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Jackson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-02-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Roddy L. Harrison, Pecos, Tex., for Jackson.

¶2Kevin E. Shannon, El Paso, Tex., Lucien B. Campbell, Fed. Public Defender, San Antonio, Tex., for Browning.

¶3Sidney Powell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Helen M. Eversberg, U.S. Atty., Michael R. Hardy, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for U.S.

¶4Charles Louis Roberts, Joseph (SIB) Abraham, Jr., El Paso, Tex., for Ryan.

¶5Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL and JONES, Circuit Judges.

¶6ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶7BY THE COURT:

¶8A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶9IT IS ORDERED that these causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/811/f2d/269 · .json · Public domain