Central Tool Co. v. International Ass'n of Machinists National Pension Fund’s Empirical Analysis
811 F.2d 651 · 1987
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 182 (§ 212 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 186 (§ 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Castor v. United States · National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of Indians
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'when neither the collective-bargaining process nor its end product violates any command of Congress, a federal court has no authority to modify the substantive terms of a collective-bargaining contract.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“so long as they result in distribution of benefits only to employees on whose behalf contributions to the fund have been made”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.