United States v. Golomb’s Empirical Analysis
811 F.2d 787 · 1987
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably United States v. Casamento (1989), United States v. Delgado (2012)
41 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)
Relies on Morissette v. United States · Solem v. Helm · Screws v. United States · Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc. v. Blankenship · Smith v. Harmsen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“acknowledged the possibility that the [victim] would soon be reimbursed by [a third party], but ... neglected to account for this contingency in the final order of judgment[,] ... the restitution order should be modified”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[t]he court, in determining whether to order restitution under section 3579 of this title and the amount of such restitution, shall consider the amount of the loss sustained by any victim as a result of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“extraordinary ... circumstances [that] demonstrate that the cumulation of valid sentences for distinct offenses constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.