811 F. Supp. 1113 - Gaumer v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Goldsboro Christian Schools, Inc. v. United States · Easton v. United States · Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp. · Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp. · International Electronics Corp. v. Flanzer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It behooves this court, therefore, while mindful of the existing Code [of ethics], to examine afresh the problems sought to be met by that Code, to weigh for itself what those problems are, how real in the practical world they are in fact, and whether a mechanical and didactic application of the Code to all situations automatically might not be productive of more harm than good, by requiring the client and the judicial system to sacrifice more than the value of the presumed benefits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any confidential communications to the [attorney] which are substantially related to the instant lawsuit? Second, ... if there were such communications, is there any likelihood that [these] communications could be used to the detriment of the [former client]?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daniels v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.