Newkirk v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Thomas v. Arn · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Melkonyan v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“should decline to exercise its post-adjudication discretion to remand for the purpose of allowing the Secretary to obtain additional evidence unless the Secretary can demonstrate good cause for why such evidence was not presented before.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Newkirk v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.