Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 811 P2D 315 - DeNardo v. Michalski

DeNardo v. Michalski’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

1 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2011

1 district · 11 state decisions

60199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stump v. Sparkman · Pulliam v. Allen · Bradley v. Fisher · Pargoud v. United States · 42 Cal. 3d 1157 - Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg, Bernard, Weiss & Karma Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contemplates some overt act and therefore 'the mere filing or maintenance of a lawsuit-even for an improper purpose-is not a basis for an abuse of process action'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.